SAGACIOUS NEWS

For Eyes That Can See ~ RELOADED

WHO: Give Us Total Control And COVID Will Be ‘The Last Pandemic’

Photo from the new WHO report, 'COVID-19: Make it the Last Pandemic'
How thinly veiled can blackmail and extortion get? The totally corrupt World Health Organization is calling for global surveillance, authority and billions more in funding in order to ensure that there won’t be pandemics in the future.

How thinly veiled can blackmail and extortion get? The totally corrupt World Health Organization is calling for global surveillance, authority and billions more in funding in order to ensure that there won’t be pandemics in the future. If the WHO has the ability to stop future pandemics, then they could have stopped the current one. Or, did they create this one in the first place? This is a straightforward shakedown of the entire planet, reminiscent of mobsters in Chicago who would approach a store owner and say, “For a mere $500 per week, we will protect your store from burning down like Mr. Jones’ experienced down the street.”

The 7 recommendations from the WHO are:

  1. Elevate pandemic preparedness and response to the highest level of political leadership.
  2. Strengthen the independence, authority and financing of WHO.
  3. Invest in preparedness now to prevent the next crisis.
  4. A new agile and rapid surveillance information and alert system.
  5. Establish a pre-negotiated platform for tools and supplies.
  6. Raise new international financing for pandemic preparedness and response.
  7. National Pandemic Coordinators have a direct line to Head of State or Government.

The authors of this article recognized the importance of the cited UN report, but were unable to find much commentary. I was pleased to be able to contribute my thoughts. ⁃ TN Editor

(LifeSite News) The World Health Organization (WHO) has released a report calling for greater authority for itself in countries around the globe, a global surveillance system, as well as billions more dollars in financing for itself.

In a report released this month entitled, COVID-19: Make it the Last Pandemic, a group called the “Independent Panel” established by the WHO, analyzed the global response to the Wuhan Virus and delivered a strong message for international changes.

They state, “Our message is loud and clear: no more pandemics.  If we fail to take this goal seriously, we will condemn the world to successive catastrophes.”

“On the basis of its diagnosis of what went wrong at each stage of the COVID-19 response, the Panel makes […] seven recommendations directed to ensuring that a future outbreak does not become a pandemic. Each recommendation is linked directly back to evidence of what has gone wrong. To be successful they must be implemented in their entirety.”

The panel is co-chaired Rt Hon. Helen Clark, former Prime Minister of New Zealand and H.E. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, former President of Liberia and Nobel Laureate and includes eleven other professionals from around the world.

Patrick Wood, Editor in Chief of Technocracy News told LifeSiteNews that, were the recommendations of the report to be implemented, “the top political leaders of each nation would become the puppets of the WHO, whenever it decides to declare a pandemic.”

“The WHO is not and never has been independent,” Wood continued. “Rather, it is a key agency of the United Nations and subservient to its ideology. It seeks additional authority over nations and needs money to accomplish it. Nobody prevents a virus from spreading, so the call for more funding is spurious at best. After contributing to the current crisis, they want to prevent the next one?”

Wood told LifeSiteNews that “total surveillance” is  “the holy grail” of the “sustainable development” agenda, which he says can also be described as the “technocracy” agenda.

“This is a fast-track conduit/supply chain for Big Pharma to push its gene therapy shots and vaccines to a generally uninformed global citizenry,” Wood added.

Regarding the so-called “Independent Panel”, Wood said:

The panel of eleven is far from “independent”. Two are associated with the elitist Trilateral Commission, two with United Nations agencies, one member of the Communist Chinese Party who was a principal in the COVID outbreak in China and all are UN ideologues. To my knowledge and study, when the United Nations calls for “independent” or “high level” panels, they are signaling the exact opposite. Those elitist/ideologues who populate such panels always and only promote one thing: Sustainable Development in all its forms and control over society.

Working together since September 2020, the panel says that it has “examined the state of pandemic preparedness prior to COVID-19,” as well as the global responses to COVID-19.

They state:

The world cannot afford to focus only on COVID-19. It must learn from this crisis, and plan for the next one. Otherwise, precious time and momentum will be lost. That is why our recommendations focus on the future. COVID-19 has been a terrible wake-up call. So now the world needs to wake up, and commit to clear targets, additional resources, new measures and strong leadership to prepare for the future. We have been warned. 

Global failure

In a 7-page summary document of the full report, the authors of the report state that “the initial outbreak became a pandemic as a result of gaps and failings at every critical juncture of preparedness for and response to COVID-19.”

According to the summary report these failings included “inadequate funding and stress testing of preparedness, despite the increasing rate at which zoonotic diseases are emerging.”

The authors of the report say that China was “quick to spot unusual clusters of pneumonia of unknown origin,” but that the procedures under the International Health Regulations were much too slow. Further, countries did not act quickly enough with an “aggressive containment strategy,” but rather took a “‘wait and see’ approach.”

As the virus spread, the WHO, trying to support the countries with advice and guidance, found that “Member States had underpowered the agency to do the job demanded of it.”

“Preparedness was underfunded and response funding was too slow,” they say. The result, they explain was “widening inequalities” in regards to the “impact on women and vulnerable and marginalized populations.”

Read More @ Source