SAGACIOUS NEWS

For Eyes That Can See ~ RELOADED

Pfizer Documents: Unvaccinated People Can Be Exposed To Experimental mRNA From Vaccinated People; Frightening Adverse Reactions

Note that this information is not new. All of the following comes from Section 8.3 of Pfizer’s own Phase 1/2/3 clinical trial data and literature, with some of said trials ongoing through 2023 and later. Those who love and yearn these shots will default to the “this information is being misinterpreted” defense. So we’re going to define the relevant terms involved herein.

(TheCovidBlog) NEW YORK — Those who cannot handle the sight of gruesome human ailments, especially women, stop reading now. What you are about to see and learn is scary and may change the way you live your daily lives.

The Centner Academy is a private K-8 school located in Miami, Florida. It made headlines last week when it announced in an email its new policy that vaccinated teachers will not be employed by the school. Current teachers who already received experimental mRNA and viral vector shots before the announcement are allowed to keep their jobs. But they must keep their (social) distance from students.

Mainstream media located all the mask and experimental shot lovers at the school to trash the owners. They even dug up an attorney, Mark Richard, who told the Tampa Bay Times that the policy barring the shots could violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The journalists, Colleen Wright and Nicholas Nehamas, failed to ask the obvious follow-up question – if barring shots violates the ADA, does forcing people to get experimental shots against their wills also violate the ADA?

One specific part of this new policy riled up mainstream media. Leila Centner, co-founder of the school with her husband, said that unvaccinated women have experienced reproductive issues, including miscarriages, simply by standing near someone who has been injected with experimental mRNA and viral vectors. Mainstream media called the claim “biologically impossible.” But Pfizer’s own literature says otherwise.

Exposure during pregnancy

Note that this information is not new. All of the following comes from Section 8.3 of Pfizer’s own Phase 1/2/3 clinical trial data and literature, with some of said trials ongoing through 2023 and later. Those who love and yearn these shots will default to the “this information is being misinterpreted” defense. So we’re going to define the relevant terms involved herein.

  • AE = adverse effect
  • SAE = severe adverse effect
  • Study intervention = A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. The intervention group is the people who receive the experimental drug. In this case, experimental mRNA shots.

We start with Section 8.3.5.1 Exposure During Pregnancy (EDP) of the Pfizer clinical trial protocols (page 62). The focus is on the last three bullet points.

The Pfizer data clearly state that a pregnant woman can be exposed to the “study intervention due to environmental exposure.” Environmental exposure can happen through “inhalation or skin contact.” This is clearly saying that any contact, including sexual contact with someone who has received the shots, exposes those who have not received the shots to the “intervention,” the synthetic mRNA or DNA.

Exposure during breastfeeding

This is Section 8.3.5.2 (page 64).

A breastfeeding mother can pass experimental mRNA to her baby if she directly received the shots or if she is “exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.” That means vaxxed co-workers, husbands, etc. can shed their experimental mRNA by breathing on or touching a nursing mother. It’s becoming clear that this is what happened to the two-year-old baby girl who died in March after exposure to Pfizer mRNA.

Occupational exposure

This one is perhaps the most scary and alarming. Section 8.3.5.3 is also on page 64.

CRF is case report form. Occupational exposure is “unplanned direct contact with the study intervention.” Again, that means exposure by inhalation or skin contact. All of the foregoing is Pfizer’s own words. Thus if mRNA shedding and contagion are “biologically impossible” as mainstream media say, then they can interview Pfizer and get some canned, gaslighting excuse for their own words.

Pfizer’s own words aren’t the most impactful part of this story, however. It is the real-life occurrences, particularly in women, of contamination by inhalation and/or skin contact, and the subsequent adverse reactions.

Disturbing menstrual cycles for unvaccinated women

Again, if you do not want to see disturbing images, leave the article now. This first image comes from the COVID Vaccine Victims page. The unvaccinated woman (who understandably chose to hide her identity) miscarried at seven weeks last month. The initial bleeding was chalked up as subchorionic hemorrhage, which is harmless in most women. But she continued bleeding until she miscarried. The fetus came out, but it was preceded by this.

Read More @ Source